Perigo’s Perspective: Cocaine in the White House! – 13 Jul 2023

There's been quite a brouhaha going on about some cocaine found in the White House. 

Speculation that it was Hooch Hunter's has been reinforced by the fact that more than a week has gone by and its owner has not been identified. 

The grotesquery that is Beijing Biden's press secretary got her panties in quite a twist when a reporter asked directly if the blow belonged to a Biden. Refusing to answer directly, Careen St-Marie Jean de Reszke, or whatever her name is, called such speculation “irresponsible.” She made much of the fact that the Bidens were away for the weekend when the powder was found—which of course doesn't remotely mean a Biden didn't place it in the little phone locker in which it was apparently discovered. 

Given that Hunter IS a crackhead who notoriously forgets to pick things up after he's dropped them off—like laptops—the finger of suspicion still strongly points to him. Not a good look hard on the heels of the sweetheart deal he was given, getting probation for a bit of tax evasion while his major crimes, accepting millions from hostile foreign powers on his father's behalf, were aggressively not pursued.

For all that, another possibility occurred to me. Apparently the closest entrance to the White House to the phone lockers is the entrance used by the Vice President. As it happens, Cackling Kamala went on TV around this time and delivered another of her vacuous word salads, a lot of vapid fluff signifying nothing. Is the reason for these blancmange bombs not just that she's flaky as fook but high as a kite as well?

Whosever blow it was, it served to distract from some serious news of edifying enormity.

I quote from the Missouri Independent of July 4:

A federal judge on Tuesday prohibited Biden administration officials from communicating with social media platforms about “protected speech,” a ruling emerging from litigation originally filed by former Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt.

The ruling, by Judge Terry A. Doughty of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Louisiana, granted a temporary injunction barring numerous federal agencies, including the Department of Health and Human Services and the Federal Bureau of Investigation, from contacting social media companies “for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring or inducing in any manner the removal, deletion, suppression or reduction of content containing protected free speech.”

Federal agencies are still allowed to notify the companies about crimes, national security threats or foreign attempts to influence elections.

The litigation was filed last year by Schmitt and Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry. It alleges the federal government colluded with social media companies like Twitter and Facebook to suppress the freedom of speech.

Ladies and gentlemen, this is momentous! YOOOOOOGE!!

Now here's more, directly from the Judge:

The Plaintiffs are likely to succeed on the merits in establishing that the Government has
used its power to silence the opposition. Opposition to COVID-19 vaccines; opposition to
COVID-19 masking and lockdowns; opposition to the lab-leak theory of COVID-19; opposition to the validity of the 2020 election; opposition to President Biden’s policies; statements that the Hunter Biden laptop story was true; and opposition to policies of the government officials in power. All were suppressed.

Although this case is still relatively young, and at this stage the Court is only examining it
in terms of Plaintiffs’ likelihood of success on the merits, the evidence produced thus far depicts an almost dystopian scenario. During the COVID-19 pandemic, a period perhaps best characterized by widespread doubt and uncertainty, the United States Government seems to have assumed a role similar to an Orwellian “Ministry of Truth.”

All of that is true, and much of it happened all over the so-called Free World, including here under Jacinda Jackboot and the Uniparty tyranny of Labour, National, ACT and the Greens.

Woke-Fascist Deep-Statist Merrick Garland's Department of Injustice is, of course, appealing the Judge's injunction. Let us pray that justice wins.

I've long had an idea of my own as to how we might protect ourselves from future Jackboots, universally: why don't all countries require all people—citizens, non-citizen residents or visitors—within their jurisdiction, as a prerequisite for being within their jurisdiction, to sign the following pledge:

“Just as I reserve the right to hold and express my opinions on any matter whatsoever, I promise to respect the right of all others to do the same. I unreservedly renounce the use of coercion and violence in the promotion of my opinions.”

Hopelessly naive of me, I know. But it should go down well in Finland!