Dr Muriel Newman

28 March, 2023

Probably the most important court case of recent times was held in Wellington last month, yet it attracted no mention in the media.

It was a Court of Appeal hearing seeking to overturn a High Court decision to grant multiple customary marine titles over a 40 km stretch of coastline near Opotiki. If the Edwards Marine and Coastal Area Act ruling stands, it will set a precedent for almost 600 yet to be determined claims, with the likely result that the ownership of virtually the entire New Zealand coastline – right out to the 12 nautical mile edge of the Territorial Sea – will pass to Maori.

The implications of tribal control should not be underestimated. Gaining customary title provides rights akin to ‘ownership’. Tribal owners can ban public access to beaches and fishing spots by declaring an area is ‘sacred’ or wahi tapu – or they can impose rahui. And commercial operators holding coastal permits – including councils, port companies, marina operators, and boat ramp owners – are likely to be targeted with annual levies to create an income stream in perpetuity.

The rich mineral wealth and natural resources like seaweed found within the coastal marine area will belong to tribal ‘owners’, who will have the right to mine it, sell it, or otherwise exploit it.

And while the legislation is meant to guarantee on-going public access to the coast, if aggressive tribal owners decide to block others from using ‘their’ area, it is difficult to see how access could be enforced.

This situation, where New Zealand’s coastline could effectively be privatised to Maori, is the complete opposite of what the National Government promised in 2011, when they repealed Crown ownership of the foreshore and seabed and opened up the coast for tribal claims.

They assured the public the law change would result in only a relative handful of successful claims – all in remote areas. And we were never informed that there was a chance the whole coast could end up in tribal hands.

To make matters worse, while no financial assistance is available for anyone wanting to oppose tribal claims, the government has provided lucrative funding of up to $458,000 for applicants to prepare their case, with further funding available for historical research as well as for legal fees and other costs associated with court hearings – including accommodation, air fares, meals and so on.

At the time National passed the Marine and Coastal Area Act they assured New Zealanders that the criteria for gaining a customary marine title were stringent. Under section 58 of the Act claimants had to satisfy two tests: firstly, they had to “hold the specified area in accordance with tikanga” – where ‘tikanga’ was defined as “Maori customary values and practices” – and secondly, they had to have “exclusively used and occupied the area without substantial interruption from 1840 to the present day.”

Overlapping claims, which are inconsistent with the concept of ‘exclusive’ use and occupation, were expected to be ruled out, as were claims for areas where third-party usage resulted in substantial interruption. And since tribal groups had limited ability to navigate far from shore back in 1840, it was expected that few Territorial Sea claims would succeed.

The Court of Appeal case hinges on the fact that in the High Court case Justice Churchman determined that since applicants had been found by a Court appointed ‘expert’ to have held their claimed areas according to ‘tikanga’, this was sufficient for Customary Marine Titles to be awarded, thereby over-ruling any requirement to consider the second limb of the test – whether the areas had been used and occupied ‘exclusively’ and continuously since 1840.

Furthermore, instead of ruling out overlapping claims for failing to meet the ‘exclusive’ use and occupation test, the Judge created “shared exclusivity” in order to accommodate them all.

Should the Appeal Court find the High Court’s interpretation of section 58 was wrong in law, then it is likely the case will be returned to the High Court for further consideration, although such a ruling would more than likely be appealed to the Supreme Court by claimants.

However, the bigger issue is that by prioritising tribal demands over the public good rights of all New Zealanders, the National Government has put the nation into an untenable situation where it could effectively be held to ransom by private owners of the country’s foreshore and seabed.

The last time this happened was after the former Chief Justice Sian Elias ruled in 2003 that ‘some’ customary title might still exist in the coastal marine area. That decision triggered such a flood of tribal claims for the coast that Labour Prime Minister Helen Clark was forced to step in, cancelling the claims, and reaffirming Crown ownership through the 2004 Foreshore and Seabed Act.

And that is the only practical solution for the situation New Zealand is now in – an incoming government must revoke the Marine and Coastal area Act and return the foreshore and seabed to Crown ownership.

What this case highlights is the huge threat to the Rule of Law and the stability of our country that’s being caused by the inclusion of ‘tikanga’ – which can be interpreted as meaning virtually anything Maori want it to mean – into legislation.

There should be no place in the law for tikanga.

Nor for Treaty ‘principles’, since the Treaty of Waitangi contains no principles.

Nor should there be any place in our regulatory system for the fictional Treaty of Waitangi ‘partnership’, since it is constitutionally impossible for subjects to be ‘partners’ with their Sovereign.

Yet, the brazen claim that Maori are ‘partners’ with the Crown is being used by the tribal elite to justify ‘co-governance’. Through 50:50 decision-making powers and the right of veto, they are gaining political control across the public and private sectors – and accumulating wealth.

Back in 2010, political commentator Chris Trotter warned what can happen if separatists gain control of organisations, by describing the demise of Corso, a charity established in 1944 to provide clothing and footwear to millions of people around the world:

“Throughout the 1980s Corso was steadily infiltrated and eventually taken over by radical Maori nationalists. Led by the Harawira family, the radicals insisted that Corso recognise and promote tino rangatiratanga – the Maori right to self-determination. To prove its bona fides to the cause of the tangata whenua, Corso was also required to devote two-thirds of its income to Maori projects. When Corso workers and supporters objected to this takeover they were subjected to withering criticism – it was much easier to leave than to fight. By 1990, the organisation was little more than a hollowed-out shell. New Zealand’s largest and most successful home- grown aid organisation had been destroyed: initially, by ideological extremism; and finally, by radical Maori nationalism.”

Under the Labour Government, not only has the public sector been radicalised by being forced to embrace the Maori supremacist agenda, but private sector organisations that have some association with the government, either through registration or funding are now being pressured to swear allegiance to the Treaty, embrace the Treaty partnership lie, and establish co-governance boards.

Sport New Zealand is a case in point. With a new Maori name, “Ihi Aotearoa”, its website states its “commitment to Te Tiriti o Waitangi and the Treaty principles of Partnership, Protection and Participation”. Affiliated bodies, like Sports Northland, have already introduced co-governance.

Local Government New Zealand, the so-called industry body for councils, has been well and truly captured, not only through their funding agreement with Nanaia Mahuta to promote Three Waters, but through their prolific advocacy for the Treaty and co-governance – including Treaty training for newly elected local government representatives.

Auckland Council’s withdrawal from LGNZ is to be applauded. Other councils should follow suit.

Real Estate Agents have also been targeted with a new requirement to undertake compulsory Treaty training: “A practical introduction to Maori culture, language (te reo), custom (tikanga) and te Tiriti o Waitangi (the Treaty of Waitangi) in the real estate context”.

To say the profession is outraged by this requirement is an understatement, but since their registration will depend on it, they will need to endure it until new political leadership hopefully sweeps it away.

Treaty training is also underway for engineers, as their website explains “a two-hour Treaty training module has been developed to help engineers understand the modern day implications and obligations of The Treaty.”

Even the accounting profession has been caught: “Chartered Accountants Australia and New Zealand is committed to honouring the Treaty of Waitangi through a process of building our own cultural competency, knowledge and connection to te ao Māori…”

This week’s NZCPR Guest Commentator, former Judge and Law Lecturer Anthony Willy, outlines how lawyers are now being pressured into swearing allegiance to the Treaty:

“On 1st March 2022 the New Zealand Law Society or as they now call themselves Te Kahui Ture o Aotearoa commissioned a report by an ‘independent panel’ into ‘Legal and Structural Change in the Law Society’… Three Commissioners were appointed: Professor Ron Paterson ONZM whose area or expertise is in health and disability services and ‘medical law’; Professor Jacinta Ruru Australian born of some Maori ancestry and lecturing at Otago Law School; and Jane Meares who has an extensive background in commercial legal work at a high level and could be presumed to understand how the legal profession works. Neither of the other two appear to have practised as barristers or solicitors and must therefore take their understanding of the profession from others.

“The report comprising 192 pages was tabled in the House in March 2023. It has a Maori name which apparently in English translates as ‘Regulating Lawyers in Aotearoa New Zealand’.

“Much of the report, deals at tedious length, with the case for an independent regulator and an independent complaints system. But at page 95 the commissioners record that their terms of reference require them to: ‘Consider changes needed to promote a commitment to honouring Te Tiriti o Waitangi and the bi cultural foundations of New Zealand including Te Ao Maori concepts… We believe it is time for this to change.’

“Interestingly this approach was rejected by 44% of those surveyed on the grounds that it would cause separatism and uncertainty within the profession and the public and dilute the lawyers’ obligation to uphold the Rule of Law…

“The commissioners had no hesitation in rejecting the view of the majority of practising lawyers and recommended that a clause be included in the proposed legislation that: ‘All persons exercising powers and performing functions and duties under this Act must give effect to the principles of the Te Tiriti o Waitangi’.”

Against the wishes of the majority of lawyers, those driving this separatist agenda not only want to force the Treaty into their regulatory framework, they also want the new regulator to ‘partner’ with Maori.

Orchestrated by the Labour Government without any mandate from the public, the tribal takeover that is now underway in New Zealand is creating deep social division and unrest. And while the State Sector has been their priority, using threats of deregulation and funding cuts, it is now being forced onto private enterprise.

Those New Zealanders who are aware that Labour is giving the iwi leaders of multi-million-dollar business development corporations power over our lives, are horrified.

But not enough Kiwis understand the threat that ‘co-governance’, which is of course a euphemism for totalitarian tribal rule, poses to freedom and democracy.

With the election fast approaching, it’s imperative that we do all we can to alert voters to the danger – and please feel free to use our newsletters to inform others, if that helps.

But we also need to know whether politicians will step up and defend our Kiwi way of life. Will they stop the tribal takeover? Will they remove references to tikanga and the Treaty from legislation? And will they repeal the Marine and Coastal Area Act?

Why not contact MPs you are thinking of voting for and ask those sorts of questions – then let us all know what they said!

Our Contributor


Share This


  1. Avatar
    Barbara March 30, 2023 at 1:58 pm - Reply

    This could be a very good move if only the writer had more knowledge.
    Heres some – the Maori have cabalists and are split in 2. The Pakeha have cabalists and are split in 2.
    You need to check out the courtcase due 30th March and realise that the govt.maori.nz are now the du jour government of NZ. Govt.maori.nz are the nonCabal Maori and leaves you in Natural Lore and Tikanga. It throws away the Corporation Govt and sets EVERY NZer free from the govt tyranny.
    This will be the 5th appearance in court and for which the legal precedent has already been set – If a matter cannot be resolved after 4 court appearances the case is automatically WON by (in this case) govt.maori.nz. And in this case its due to the NZ Govt Inc failing to prove they have jurisdiction of NZ.
    So dear writer of this post that Im commenting on here – please let us know if you are writing about the Maori Cabalists aka the Mahuta and Jackson crew or are you writing about the NonCabal Maori who are persuing all our kiwi freedoms.
    If you cant split these 2 factors of our govt into their appropriate cabal or non cabal then you are not really awake enough to see the big picture.
    Today is the day. Please wake up.
    God bless you

  2. Avatar
    NancySmith March 30, 2023 at 4:42 pm - Reply

    This is frightening and worst of all it’s happening ‘behind our backs’ we need to wake up and do something about this.

  3. Avatar
    Kerin April 2, 2023 at 8:37 am - Reply

    I have no words. And no tears left

  4. Avatar
    Ron April 6, 2023 at 1:05 pm - Reply

    In New Zealand we are one Nation under one system of Law. If necessary I will fight to the death to uphold that truth.

  5. Avatar
    Jim April 12, 2023 at 7:43 pm - Reply

    So sick and depressed by this goverment and all mp's
    4th generation kiwi and im hateing New Zealand and wont to leave.
    What an evil clown world full of greedy deviant rich scum.
    Stop the bus i wont to get off

  6. Avatar
    Tui Aroha Williams April 13, 2023 at 12:15 am - Reply

    The fact you believe this and you are a Dr defies logic, not only were Maori here first they were forced to be slaves without title, so you believe you deserve a share because you deserve it yet have done nothing to enrich the lives of those whose land you landed on, whether you are Maori or not your words are disgraceful.

    • Avatar
      Michael May 26, 2024 at 11:35 am - Reply

      Tui, comment by comment:-

      Dr Muriel Newman backs up every claim with indisputable factual references.
      It is well known and forensically proven that Maori were not here first, in proven fact the green-eyed, ginger-haired race and then the mori ori were here first ( until either eaten or driven to outer New Zealand islands by primitive and highly aggressive Maori).

      Lastly, you appear to conveniently just ignore all of the benefits of colonialism, and the list is huge, and we all enjoy those colonial benefits, Eg; electricity, hot and cold running water, sanitisation, TV ( for what it’s worth,), cars, Christian faith ( which clarified amongst its 10 commandments to stop killing your brothers and eating them), the list is truly huge, too large to place in this response.

      Maori, prior to the ‘treaty saviour’, te Tiriti o Waitangi and it’s exact English version by Busby, (not the fraudulent one as used in Te Papa , by James Freeman,), that te Tiriti was translated from had not developed even the basic things of evolving humans, Eg; the wheel, or shoes, in all of the approx 700 years they had lived in New Zealand!?!

      Tui, you need to get the facts to help you accurately to make up your own mind on this very important topic.
      If you reveal your email address, all such facts can be promptly shared for you.
      If you don’t, then you simply wish to remain in the false dark!?

  7. Avatar
    John Coker April 13, 2023 at 1:47 pm - Reply

    The reason partnership models are becoming more common are because more kiwis are supporting them. As you highlight, if 44% of lawyers rejected the approach that implies 66% supported it. New Zealander’s love of fairness is making most of us realise that Maori have been treated unfairly and still are and people are trying to fix that. How cogovernance and legal tikanga develop are areas that NZ is leading the world in developing. The problem that you face is not that NZ is facing a “tribal takeover” it is that most pakiha no longer believe in a country where professionals have ignorance of Maori and Maori only get to contribute to decisions as a democratic minority.

    • Avatar
      Rob vL July 31, 2023 at 9:29 pm - Reply

      Hi JC, Can you please tell me what 44% plus 66% equals??

      • Avatar
        Burt May 26, 2024 at 12:02 pm - Reply

        10% Ewi Activists ?

  8. Avatar
    Geraldine Pene April 22, 2023 at 9:26 pm - Reply

    All's fair in love and war…

    Here's to the Maori takeover!

  9. Avatar
    Mary Feary May 16, 2023 at 5:11 pm - Reply

    Viewpoint is skewed to polarise the Community.
    Tikanga, like it or not IS embedded in Ti Tirity.
    Least we forget…or apparently chose to ignore our Founding document (alongside He Whakaputanga 1835) is saving our ass from WEF and associated globalist maggots.
    I would a thousand times trust Maori to be fair and just above the Govts dirty Agendas.
    Further, author of this piece doesn't stand by thier viewpoint. If this is what you think then own it!

  10. Avatar
    David Grice May 20, 2023 at 4:48 pm - Reply

    Absolutely disgusting if this is brought into law and is just plain creating more of a divide between Māori and European,we are one race and one country

  11. Avatar
    Cat Parker May 22, 2023 at 6:39 am - Reply

    This feels very white, old man and disregards the trauma the crown has caused to nz and its native Māori. This has completely put me off voices for freedom. You appear to only want your ideals to be free … not the Māori (who you’re happy to exploit for tourism opportunities). I think you guys should be shut down… you’re going too far.

  12. Avatar
    Bruce June 8, 2023 at 9:35 am - Reply

    Wow. Scary stuff! Your average NZ birdbrain would not understand the implications here. That's the problem!

  13. Avatar
    Barbara June 23, 2023 at 4:13 pm - Reply

    Oh my goodness. This is just awful. It is obviously anti treaty of Waitangi and pro National.
    This sad ignorance is evidence that ‘Treaty Training' aka acknowledging history ought to be compulsory for all who live here.
    Once you learn, you cant unlearn the facts. Once your eyes have been opened you cant close them. Its not about them and us. Its just us. Come on….learn.

  14. Avatar
    Dave Geraghty July 5, 2023 at 11:27 pm - Reply

    This is as daming as you can get also 100% correct..

  15. Avatar
    Kathryn July 8, 2023 at 9:24 pm - Reply

    I don;t think most will wake up until one day they arrive at the beach with the family and will be denied access or asked for a substantial fee. At that point there will be blood on the sand sooner or later, you can take that to the bank.
    Far better for the National government to grow some guts and repeal ALL race based laws and regulations, re-estab;ish the rule of one law for all and return control to local councils, even if with some oversight to make sure rates are wisely spent on esseentials before ‘nice to haves'. Sure, there would be howls of “racism” and appeals to UN etc. but a government too lily livered to tell these left-dominated supremacists to go take a jump will just pass it all to the tribal elite. If/when that happens the country will descend into a Zimbabwe type ruin within 5 to 10 years.
    It seems to me that the only way to avoid a third world country (or worse) and/or a civil war, is to act now, before the end of 2023.
    If Labour gets back in we will be effectively denied any vote power at all to remove them, ever. The 50% Maori vote and their right of veto will ensure that any chance of their being voted from power is gone for ever.
    Most Kiwis do not want to believe this, so may very well let it happen, or be bribed by the usual election year ‘lollipops'.

  16. Avatar
    Perce Harpham July 11, 2023 at 6:40 pm - Reply

    Thank you Muriel.
    This is a very clear and alarming “wake up” call. It expresses my fears better than I have done in my just published book ” The Corruption of New Zealand”. This is available in PDF format free of charge until the end of this July. Go to
    The book provides a historical build-up to how we have come to this point. As a 91 year old I have actually lived with the slow overwhelming power of the block vote of the Maori seats. The book is something of an explanation of why I have resigned in shame at what “my” Party has done. I attach an article which deals with this more briefly.
    Currently I am deeply concerned that the huge expenditure of taxpayer funds on lying propaganda and fallacious education means that those under 35 appear to have been “sold” and will vote for the country's continuation into the abyss.
    I hold out a hope that the reason why I have been a royalist all my life is that the King has two powers and will use them. These powers are to dissolve Parliament and to refuse to ask a person to form a Government. Older people will remember that the Queen exercised her power and dissolved the Australian Government some years ago.
    I hope that the Governor General has been keeping the King informed about this rogue Government and that she will now exercise her devolved power to refuse to sign into law any more race based Acts until after the election. Also that the KIng will then act to protect his own mandate if necessary. Otherwise there is no point in having either the King or the Governor-General.
    I perceive that mounting a campaign to petition the King would serve to unite all the protest groups and would get the attention of many people who are not well informed or think the problems do not exist or will go away of their own accord.
    Such a campaign needs a leader and funding. It is an urgent need. Muriel you are very well qualified and able to organise and present such a petition. Will you do it?
    Thank you for what you are doing and best wishes.

    Perce Harpham

Leave A Comment