
by Rachel Stewart
I’ve come to value my role here with ‘Riding Shotgun’ as that of a harbinger. Yes, sometimes of doom.
I’m drawn to bringing to light issues – often unpalatable – that I see as needing to be more well-known or even just known.
This week is no different. Except, instead of being just your standard-type of insanity, this one is stratospheric on the lunacy scale. In other words, it’s off the charts.
Did you clock the “thousands of planes”? Like, call me an idiot but wouldn’t those thousands of planes – massive jets no less – cause even more unwelcome carbon emissions?
If it’s really about climate change why aren’t we talking about phasing out world-wide commercial aviation? By all research it’s one of the largest planetary polluters but, I’m guessing that’s not on the table as something to give up.
Anyway, the brain flatulence behind solar geoengineering – or solar radiation modification – is essentially to simulate what happens when volcanoes push particles into the atmosphere. A major eruption, such as that of Mt. Pinatubo, in the Philippines, in 1992, measurably cooled the global temperature for a year or two.
Pinatubo injected about 15m tons of sulphur dioxide into the stratosphere, where it reacted with water to form a hazy layer of aerosol particles composed mainly of sulfuric acid droplets. Over the course of the next two years, strong stratospheric winds spread those aerosol particles around the planet.
So far, so natural disaster.
But the real possibility of a man-made disaster is now looming with the British Government having funded an organisation called ARIA – Advanced Research + Invention Agency.
I might also add that this particular paragraph stood out on their website as part of their grandiose mission statement; ‘Many will fail to meet their target, but their efforts will inspire the next generation. Those that do succeed will generate massive social and economic returns.’
So is it really about the climate or is it really about the pingers? I mean, that’s become the central question mark about everything to do with climate change, hasn’t it?
And if, as proponents of this crazy experiment have made abundantly clear, this is a last-ditch effort to save humanity from entering an unstoppable climate tipping point, then we’re all up the Murrumbidgee in a barbed-wire canoe.
Or it’s something else. Something else entirely.
But whatever it is, the two largest questions have to be these. What will actually happen when we put particles – made up of God only knows what -into the stratosphere, and who gets to make the call to do it?
Heard of a thing called informed consent? I bet you have. There’s none of that happening here.
Heard of Dr. John Campbell? He knows a fair bit about the Covid vaccine and a lack of informed consent, and biology, and a whole host of other things. Here he is on the subject of dimming the sun.
Now I don’t think you have to be a scientist or an expert on climate of any kind to know in your bones that attempting to control the weather is wrong. Nor do you have to be a Christian.
But if you are a Christian – or just someone with a strong, moral compass and a capacity for thinking – you may well identify with Russell Brand’s sentiment.
So, there you have it.
Basically, a rag tag bunch of un-credentialed, nakedly ambitious fever dreamers in Britain, who don’t have to respond to any OIA’s or questioning, are planning to perform the largest world-wide human experiment in history, all with zero informed consent from you, me, or the gate post.
Given all of this, if you’re arrogant enough to roll your eyes every time someone breathlessly whispers those two little words in your ear – chem trails – maybe don’t.