data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d72e4/d72e404a2c13b23d46c5f9ad1211ee2bd92bef3a" alt="2024_10_17_BREAKFAST_ALISTAIR_REPORT_MICHAEL_CONNETT_JPG"
In the first of a two-part interview, Alistair Harding talked to Michael Connett, the lead attorney in a recent US court case that forced US health agencies to stop suppressing a bombshell report on fluoride toxicity, and led to a Federal Court judge ruling that fluoride poses an unreasonable risk of IQ loss in children. Why would health agencies want to suppress this?
For more on Michael, check out:
Website: www.sirillp.com
Video: www.fluoridealert.org
Share This
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d72e4/d72e404a2c13b23d46c5f9ad1211ee2bd92bef3a" alt="2024_10_17_BREAKFAST_ALISTAIR_REPORT_MICHAEL_CONNETT_JPG"
In the first of a two-part interview, Alistair Harding talked to Michael Connett, the lead attorney in a recent US court case that forced US health agencies to stop suppressing a bombshell report on fluoride toxicity, and led to a Federal Court judge ruling that fluoride poses an unreasonable risk of IQ loss in children. Why would health agencies want to suppress this?
For more on Michael, check out:
Website: www.sirillp.com
Video: www.fluoridealert.org