![2025_02_05_PB_JANET_DICKSON_V3](https://media.realitycheck.radio/2025/02/2025_02_05_PB_JANET_DICKSON_V3.jpg)
The High Court has ruled against Auckland real estate agent Janet Dickson in her legal challenge regarding the Te Kākano course, which is mandatory for real estate agents to maintain their licenses. Janet argued that the course is irrelevant to essential industry principles like integrity, contract law, and consumer protection. She also expressed concerns about potential judicial overreach and political influence in the ruling. With the decision now final, she faces the risk of losing her license for five years if she does not comply with the course requirements, which she is unwilling to do.
Despite this setback, Janet remains resolute, seeking support from legal and advocacy groups, including the Free Speech Union and Hobson’s Pledge, to advocate for changes in the law. She believes her case highlights broader issues of regulatory overreach that could have implications for other professions as well. Discussions about an appeal are in progress, as Janet and her supporters view this as a fight for professional freedom and fairness within New Zealand's regulatory framework.
Share This
![2025_02_05_PB_JANET_DICKSON_V3](https://media.realitycheck.radio/2025/02/2025_02_05_PB_JANET_DICKSON_V3.jpg)
The High Court has ruled against Auckland real estate agent Janet Dickson in her legal challenge regarding the Te Kākano course, which is mandatory for real estate agents to maintain their licenses. Janet argued that the course is irrelevant to essential industry principles like integrity, contract law, and consumer protection. She also expressed concerns about potential judicial overreach and political influence in the ruling. With the decision now final, she faces the risk of losing her license for five years if she does not comply with the course requirements, which she is unwilling to do.
Despite this setback, Janet remains resolute, seeking support from legal and advocacy groups, including the Free Speech Union and Hobson’s Pledge, to advocate for changes in the law. She believes her case highlights broader issues of regulatory overreach that could have implications for other professions as well. Discussions about an appeal are in progress, as Janet and her supporters view this as a fight for professional freedom and fairness within New Zealand's regulatory framework.